<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Elite Recruitment, Top Careers, Golden Jobs &#187; Salaries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://qual-features.com/archives/category/salaries/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://qual-features.com</link>
	<description>Swiss Executives and Professionals - The Club for Top Talent in Switzerland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:11:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>High Salaries and High Dudgeon</title>
		<link>http://qual-features.com/archives/1397</link>
		<comments>http://qual-features.com/archives/1397#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Bachmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Executives and Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonus compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive base salary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive salaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management consultants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay for luck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay packages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay-for-performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[variable salary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qual-features.com/?p=1397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="alignright"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4600297498612556";
/* 336x280, created 10/28/08 */
google_ad_slot = "5511214256";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<p>The polemic over the ultra-high salaries, remunerations and compensation packages of top managers continues to rage.  Over the past 30 years, the multiplier between the least well-paid and most highly paid workers has continued to grow, from roughly 20 &#8211; 25 in 1980 to over 500 in 2008.  The shining incompetence of many of these top paid executives &#8212; particularly in the finance sector&#8211; which has brought several venerable financial institutions to the brink of ruin, has put in relief the absurdity of the market&#8217;s valuation of these jobs and these executives professional skills.</p>
<p>When last month it was published that the new CEO of ABB had obtained a CHF 19.2 million annual salary, commentators in the press and specialists on governance were scandalized, particularly in view of the climate of economic meltdown, in which the business world was supposed to have learned that such high salaries were based on fictitious metrics of added value.  These commentators remark that market principles should dictate that executive compensation falls drastically in a period when profits plummet and there are mass layoffs.  Not so, it appears.  Rather, there is an enormous discrepancy between the logic and the widely held public opinion, and themarket principles that appear to operate.</p>
<p class="alignleft"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4600297498612556";
/* 336x280, created 10/28/08 */
google_ad_slot = "5511214256";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<p>While all over the planet companies being helped by governments are being forced to cap salaries, those that have not as of yet need public rescue are also re-thinking their compensation packages.  Consultancies specializing in executive compensation have reported a large movement among industry to follow the trend to restructure corporate salary scales after the forced shake-out in executive compensation in the financial / banking sector.</p>
<p>An important factor apparently limiting reform is the global market for CEOs, and consequently their salaries are set as a result of international norms based presumably on supply and demand.   The new thinking in the progressive fringe of executive pay reform is to define a base salary relative to the market in which the executive is operating and linking the variable / performance part of the executive’s compensation to such indices as employee satisfaction and the long term development of the business, looking beyond simple short term profits.  Clearly, one of the lessons bitterly learned has been that enormous bonus compensation was disbursed based on short term profits which were subsequently revealed to be figments of accounting, vaporizing into staggering losses.</p>
<p>Management schools, academic institutes, government officials and itinerant consultants are now sagely speaking of pay relative to “long term results.”  Professors at the University of Lausanne and at IMD have recently made statements about the necessity for judging performance on the long term – that is, over 5 or 10 years.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4600297498612556";
/* 728x90, created 10/28/08 */
google_ad_slot = "1349936765";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em><a href="http://qual-features.com/archives/1397#comments">Leave A Comment</a><br />&copy;2012 <a href="http://qual-features.com">Elite Recruitment, Top Careers, Golden Jobs</a>. All Rights Reserved.qual-features.com</em></small></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="alignright"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4600297498612556";
/* 336x280, created 10/28/08 */
google_ad_slot = "5511214256";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<p>The polemic over the ultra-high salaries, remunerations and compensation packages of top managers continues to rage.  Over the past 30 years, the multiplier between the least well-paid and most highly paid workers has continued to grow, from roughly 20 &#8211; 25 in 1980 to over 500 in 2008.  The shining incompetence of many of these top paid executives &#8212; particularly in the finance sector&#8211; which has brought several venerable financial institutions to the brink of ruin, has put in relief the absurdity of the market&#8217;s valuation of these jobs and these executives professional skills.</p>
<p>When last month it was published that the new CEO of ABB had obtained a CHF 19.2 million annual salary, commentators in the press and specialists on governance were scandalized, particularly in view of the climate of economic meltdown, in which the business world was supposed to have learned that such high salaries were based on fictitious metrics of added value.  These commentators remark that market principles should dictate that executive compensation falls drastically in a period when profits plummet and there are mass layoffs.  Not so, it appears.  Rather, there is an enormous discrepancy between the logic and the widely held public opinion, and themarket principles that appear to operate.</p>
<p class="alignleft"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4600297498612556";
/* 336x280, created 10/28/08 */
google_ad_slot = "5511214256";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<p>While all over the planet companies being helped by governments are being forced to cap salaries, those that have not as of yet need public rescue are also re-thinking their compensation packages.  Consultancies specializing in executive compensation have reported a large movement among industry to follow the trend to restructure corporate salary scales after the forced shake-out in executive compensation in the financial / banking sector.</p>
<p>An important factor apparently limiting reform is the global market for CEOs, and consequently their salaries are set as a result of international norms based presumably on supply and demand.   The new thinking in the progressive fringe of executive pay reform is to define a base salary relative to the market in which the executive is operating and linking the variable / performance part of the executive’s compensation to such indices as employee satisfaction and the long term development of the business, looking beyond simple short term profits.  Clearly, one of the lessons bitterly learned has been that enormous bonus compensation was disbursed based on short term profits which were subsequently revealed to be figments of accounting, vaporizing into staggering losses.</p>
<p>Management schools, academic institutes, government officials and itinerant consultants are now sagely speaking of pay relative to “long term results.”  Professors at the University of Lausanne and at IMD have recently made statements about the necessity for judging performance on the long term – that is, over 5 or 10 years.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4600297498612556";
/* 728x90, created 10/28/08 */
google_ad_slot = "1349936765";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://qual-features.com/archives/1397/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swiss Salaries to Rise in 2009</title>
		<link>http://qual-features.com/archives/681</link>
		<comments>http://qual-features.com/archives/681#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Bachmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy and Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lohn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salaires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qual-features.com/?p=681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="alignleft"><!--adsense#largesquare--></p>
<p> According to economists at UBS,  Swiss salaries declined on average in 2008.  The UBS analysts neglected to mention whether salary declines in Switzerland were aided or offset by remuneration packages paid to UBS executives.</p>
<p>The UBS study, which surveyed over 350 companies and more than a dozen sectors of the economy, concluded that salaries in Switzerland would rise in 2009.  the projections are based on projected rises in compensation packages minus the effects of increases in the cost of living.</p>
<p>In 2008, salaries declined roughly .5% as a result of steep increases in the cost of living in Switzerland, notably in raw materials (gas and food) as well in rent.  </p>
<p class="alignright"><!--adsense#largesquare--></p>
<p> Economists are betting on a trend reversal in 2009, based on the supposition of both salary increases and price deflation (or at least stagnation) based on the projected economic slow-down.     The UBS analysts believe that inflation will fall below 1.4% in 2009.  The net result, if the analysts are correct, will be a 1% gain in purchasing power on average.</p>
<p>Last week, Migros announced salary increases for its 88,000 strong workforce of roughly 3%, as well as a raise of their minimum salary from CHF 3300 to CHF 3700.  The measure is expected to cost Migros approximately CHF 130 million, but the management at Migros believes the measure will buy them an important amount of confidence and good will in this period of turbulence in financial markets and the economy.   Other sectors announcing wage increases: construction industry.  The salaries of jobs in building and construction will rise 2.4% following vigorous negotiations and conflict between company owners and the unions.  </p>
<p>The largest wage increases are expected to be for jobs in the IT and telecoms fields (+3%), as well as the luxury watch brands (2.9%) and the machine industry (+2.8%).   Jobs in banking and finance and jobs in insurance are expected to see salary increases of slightly less than 2%. </p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em><a href="http://qual-features.com/archives/681#comments">Leave A Comment</a><br />&copy;2012 <a href="http://qual-features.com">Elite Recruitment, Top Careers, Golden Jobs</a>. All Rights Reserved.qual-features.com</em></small></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="alignleft"><!--adsense#largesquare--></p>
<p> According to economists at UBS,  Swiss salaries declined on average in 2008.  The UBS analysts neglected to mention whether salary declines in Switzerland were aided or offset by remuneration packages paid to UBS executives.</p>
<p>The UBS study, which surveyed over 350 companies and more than a dozen sectors of the economy, concluded that salaries in Switzerland would rise in 2009.  the projections are based on projected rises in compensation packages minus the effects of increases in the cost of living.</p>
<p>In 2008, salaries declined roughly .5% as a result of steep increases in the cost of living in Switzerland, notably in raw materials (gas and food) as well in rent.  </p>
<p class="alignright"><!--adsense#largesquare--></p>
<p> Economists are betting on a trend reversal in 2009, based on the supposition of both salary increases and price deflation (or at least stagnation) based on the projected economic slow-down.     The UBS analysts believe that inflation will fall below 1.4% in 2009.  The net result, if the analysts are correct, will be a 1% gain in purchasing power on average.</p>
<p>Last week, Migros announced salary increases for its 88,000 strong workforce of roughly 3%, as well as a raise of their minimum salary from CHF 3300 to CHF 3700.  The measure is expected to cost Migros approximately CHF 130 million, but the management at Migros believes the measure will buy them an important amount of confidence and good will in this period of turbulence in financial markets and the economy.   Other sectors announcing wage increases: construction industry.  The salaries of jobs in building and construction will rise 2.4% following vigorous negotiations and conflict between company owners and the unions.  </p>
<p>The largest wage increases are expected to be for jobs in the IT and telecoms fields (+3%), as well as the luxury watch brands (2.9%) and the machine industry (+2.8%).   Jobs in banking and finance and jobs in insurance are expected to see salary increases of slightly less than 2%. </p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://qual-features.com/archives/681/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

